BLOG:

Experts' Valuation Arguments Rejected as Net Opinion in Hoboken Taking

by: Joseph Grather
28 Feb 2014
Hudson County Assignment Judge Peter Bariso recently rejected a property owner’s argument that the date of value should be a date earlier than the commencement of condemnation action on August 23, 2012.  City of Hoboken v. Ponte Equities, Inc. (Docket No. HUD-L-4095-12).  The property owner argued that the date of value should have been June... Read More

Undersized Lot Receives Variance From Court to Avoide Inverse Condemnation Claim

by: Joseph Grather
18 Feb 2014
While not our prototypical condemnation case, a trial judge in Ocean County aptly reversed a local zoning board in Jerman v. Tp. of Manchester (Docket No. OCN-L-1844-13).  If affirmed the zoning board’s denial of a bulk variance that would have zoned the property into inutility; that is, it would have rendered the property valueless and would thereby... Read More

Beach Erosion Caused by Jetties May Constitute a Taking

by: Joseph Grather
11 Feb 2014
The latest in a long-running dispute between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and lake-front property owners in Michigan, whose beaches have allegedly been washed away because of jetties installed by the Army Corps long ago, is a ruling from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the takings’ claims... Read More

NJ Supreme Court Adds Two Redevelopment Related Cases to Docket

by: Joseph Grather
29 Jan 2014
The first case is In re: Petition for Referendum to Repeal Ordinance 2354-12 of the Tp. of West Orange.  The certified question: “Was plaintiffs’ action challenging the municipal redevelopment ordinance time barred and, if not, was the ordinance invalid because of the municipality’s failure to submit an application for approval of the issuance of bonds to... Read More

NJ's Post-Sandy Planning Questioned on Video

by: Joseph Grather
9 Jan 2014
As Warner Wolf used to say, “let’s go to the video tape!” NJ.com video of Post-Sandy infrastructure planning process. While it may be understandable why New Jersey political leaders are not rushing to New York for answers to the problem, it would be in our best interests if they did look towards the Kingdom of... Read More

Gideon's Trumpet Continues to Sound

by: Joseph Grather
6 Jan 2014
Gearing up for 2014, I came across a good read in a web magazine published by the International Right of Way Association.  The article is a conversation with a “Fierce Advocate for Just Compensation” – Gideon Kanner, Esq.  Kanner is a professor of law emeritus at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, and is our... Read More

Rails to Trails Case on Supreme Court Docket

by: Joseph Grather
23 Dec 2013
Signing off on 2013 and looking towards 2014, an interesting case with property rights implications is scheduled for argument before the United States Supreme Court on January 14, 2014.  The case is captioned Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States.   The Court certified the following question for briefing and argument: “This case involves the... Read More

Arkansas Game Remand Equals Just Compensation for Property Owner

by: Joseph Grather
6 Dec 2013
Almost a year to the date after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the governmental taking caused by an Army Corps controlled flooding program was compensable. The Circuit Court “affirm[ed] the judgment of the Court... Read More

Harrison Township Amendment to Redevelopment Plan Affirmed on Appeal

by: Joseph Grather
26 Nov 2013
In an unpublished per curiam opinion, the Appellate Division affirmed dismissal of a property owner’s challenge to a municipal ordinance adopting an amended redevelopment plan. Mullica Hills Supermarkets, LLC v. Harrison. The background followed the familiar redevelopment path.  An area was designated “in need of redevelopment” in 2008, and a redevelopment plan was adopted contemporaneous... Read More

Mt Holly Gardens Case Settles Before USSCT Review

by: Joseph Grather
18 Nov 2013
As recently reported by the New York Times, the infamous Mt Holly Gardens redevelopment/discrimination case settled before the United States Supreme Court heard argument scheduled for December 4, 2013. The Supreme Court granted certiorari back in June, and the case was eagerly anticipated by Civil Rights groups across the nation. Olga Pomar of South Jersey Legal Services... Read More