BLOG: Court Decisions
Expert’s “Gut Feeling” on Costs Survives Dismissal Claim
An expert witness’s “gut feeling” about the cost of a plaintiff’s construction claim was sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss according to a recent New Jersey Appellate Division opinion. The holding in Nevins v. Toll Brothers, Inc., has the potential to affect similar motions in real estate valuation litigation such as eminent domain and real estate... Read More
South Carolina: Attorneys' Fees Can't Be "Taken"
Court Holds Appointed Attorneys’ Time is Compensable Property As our colleague from Hawaii, Robert Thomas, recently posted in his excellent blog, inversecondemnation.com, the South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled that an attorney’s services constitute a property right which entitles the attorney to just compensation under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. An appointed attorney sought removal as appointed counsel... Read More
Asbury Park Settlement Rejected
City’s Misconstrued Settlement to Property Owners’ Not Enforceable A New Jersey appeals court recently held that a settlement allegedly reached with a property owner in the Asbury Park oceanfront redevelopment area was not enforceable. Asbury Partners, as the master redeveloper of Asbury Park’s waterfront redevelopment area, had requested that the City condemn certain properties which it was unable... Read More
Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies Torpedos Case
A New Jersey appellate court recently affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of a civil rights/due process claim by a Somerset County property owner who alleged that it was denied the right to develop its acreage in Millstone Borough over the course of several years where efforts to develop the property were stalled. Rezem Family Associates... Read More
When a Private Beach is Really Not Private
The Texas Supreme Court has decided to reconsider its opinion in Severance v. Patterson, No. 09-0378 (Tx. Nov. 5, 2010), where that court was asked to decide “whether private beachfront properties on Galveston Island’s West Beach are impressed with a right of public use under Texas law without proof of an easement” when an avulsive event... Read More
Another Inverse Condemnation Complaint Bounced
A New Jersey appeals court recently affirmed the dismissal of an inverse condemnation complaint filed by a property owner against the Township of Mount Laurel, which asserted that a resolution adopted by the Township amounted to a total regulatory taking of his property. Carroll v. Township of Mt. Laurel, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate... Read More
Broker Denied Right to Intervene in Condemnation Case
Brokerage Fee Issue Considered “Peripheral” A trial court’s decision to deny a real estate broker’s motion to intervene into an existing condemnation action to argue for a brokers fee was affirmed after the Appellate Division found “those issues have nothing to do with adjudicating the fair market value of the property as determined by the... Read More
Hackensack Redevelopment Challenge Permitted Over Objection to Hearing Notice
Redevelopment Notice Statute Upheld as Constitutional on Appeal Despite categorizing certain notice provisions in New Jersey’s redevelopment statute as “spotty and incomplete” based upon the 2008 decision in Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRose, 398 N.J. Super. 361 (App. Div. 2008), the New Jersey appellate court recently upheld the method by which planning boards must... Read More
Late Claim Allowed in Zoning Dispute
The New Jersey Supreme Court reinstated a dismissed complaint after finding that the forty-five day statute of limitations in R. 4:69-6(b)(3) should be enlarged because “‘it is manifest that the interest of justice so requires.’” The facts were undisputed. In May 2008 the Hopewell Township Planning Board granted preliminary site plan approval for a development... Read More
Court Refuses to Hear Columbia University Redevelopment Case
The United States Supreme Court today issued its decision denying property owner Nick Sprayregen’s petition for certification. The two issues raised in the petition were: “1) Whether it was error for the Court of Appeals of New York to disregard the principles enunciated in Kelo v. City of New London in sanctioning the use of... Read More
