BLOG:
How Can A Taking By Eminent Domain Affect Your Taxes?
Having your property taken from you against your will can be difficult by itself, but losing your property and paying additional taxes after the property is taken is a harsh reality that many property owners face when confronted with eminent domain. In a prior blog post, we explained that the government has the inherent right... Read More
How To Win Your Property Tax Appeal? Here Are 5 Steps To Follow
Understanding how to win a property tax appeal is crucial for New Jersey property owners, as property taxes are not fixed expenses. Successfully appealing your tax assessment may create opportunities for hundreds or even thousands of dollars in yearly savings. With that being said, below are five basic steps that can increase your chances of... Read More
East Orange Resident Faces an Uphill Battle After a Surprise Tax Foreclosure
Buying, owning, and securing property can be one of the most monumental and emotionally taxing periods in a person’s life. As John Adams once noted, “[p]roperty must be secured, or liberty cannot exist.” Discourses on Davila, in 6 Works of John Adams 280 (C. Adams ed. 1851). These principles are woven throughout the story of... Read More
The Difference Between Eminent Domain and Condemnation: What You Need to Know
While the terms “eminent domain” and “condemnation” are often used interchangeably, the difference between eminent domain and condemnation may come as a surprise to most. Eminent domain refers to the government’s power to take private property for public use, while condemnation is the legal process through which this power is exercised. Understanding these distinctions is... Read More
What Can NJ Property Owners Expect from President Biden’s $1.2 Trillion Infrastructure Bill?
On November 15, 2021, President Joe Biden signed a $1.2 trillion federal infrastructure bill (the “Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act”) that provides New Jersey with an estimated $12.3 billion in funding over the next five years to revitalize the state’s dilapidated roads, railways, bridges, and tunnels. While widespread infrastructure repair is long overdue in New... Read More
Making Amends: California Decides to Return Bruce’s Beach Almost a Century After the Pretextual Condemnation
In late September 2021, California’s Gov. Gavin Newsom, signed a law authorizing Los Angeles County to return a beach property taken by eminent domain back to descendants of the original property owners. The property, widely known as Bruce’s Beach, was originally bought by Willa and Charles Bruce in 1912 and quickly became a thriving retreat... Read More
Farmland Assessment Case Won’t Be Decided ‘Till the Cows Come Home
A recent Tax Court decision in 187 Dey Road Association, LLC v. South Brunswick by the Honorable Mark Cimino, J.T.C., chose not to address whether a 65-acre parcel of property should receive a farmland assessment or be obligated to pay rollback taxes. Rather, the Court held that summary judgment was inappropriate due to the factual... Read More
Gym Owner Loses Challenge to COVID Shutdown Order
A New Jersey kickboxing business owner was recently denied compensation for the closure and limitations placed on its business under COVID-19 “shutdown” orders signed by Governor Phil Murphy. The business, JWC Fitness, LLC, based in Franklin, New Jersey, shut its doors in March 2020 in compliance with Murphy’s Executive Order 104, thereby closing its business... Read More
Michigan Supreme Court Allows Flint Water Crisis Victim to Assert an Inverse Condemnation Claim
From 1964 through late April 2014, the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (“DWSD”) supplied Flint, Michigan residents with water from Lake Huron. On March 28, 2013, the State Treasurer recommended to the Governor that he authorize the plan to construct an alternative water supply system. Thereafter, on April 16, 2013, the Governor authorized a process... Read More
6th Circuit Rules “Tree Ordinance” Requiring Trees Be Replaced Or Pay A Fine Resulted In Unconstitutional Taking
A recent 6th Circuit Court of Appeals decision determined that a tree ordinance resulted in an unconstitutional taking. The ordinance required any removed trees to be replanted or else pay a fine. The suit, filed by F.P. Development against Charter Township of Canton, Michigan challenged the Ordinance claiming that, inter alia, it constituted a taking of... Read More
