BLOG:
Is Preliminary Entry a Taking Requiring Just Compensation?
The Eminent Domain Act of 1971 grants a condemnor a right to “preliminary entry.” The statute provides: “Prior to the commencement of any action, a prospective condemnor and its employees and agents, during reasonable business hours, may enter upon any property which it has authority to condemn for the purpose of making studies, surveys, tests,... Read More
A Primer on Valuing a Condemnation Case: The Sales Comparison Approach
In the typical condemnation case (if there even is such a thing as a “typical” case), the “fair market value” of the property taken, plus any damages to any remaining property is the measure of the award of just compensation. The appraisal profession employs the term “market value” defined as: The most probable price, as... Read More
First Highway Access Case Published In Years – Same As It Ever Was
For the first time in several years, the New Jersey Appellate Division has published an opinion interpreting the provisions of the State Highway Access Management Act, N.J.S.A. 27:7–89 to –98 (“the Act”), and the State Highway Access Management Code, N.J.A.C. 16:47–1.1 to –14.1 (the “Access Code”). The IMO Route 66 case presented the Court “with... Read More
Illinois Falls in Line With Kirby Forest and Reverses Big Tax Refund
The Illinois Supreme Court filed an opinion on September 21, 2023 in MB Financial Bank v. Brophy (opinion here). In 2018, the property owner filed a complaint seeking a refund for overpayment of taxes on the low-income apartment building known as Evergreen Terrace it operated in Chicago. The property owner claimed that it had... Read More
Holy Sheetz! Another Takings Case on the Supreme Court Docket
Yesterday, we posted about the Supreme Court granting cert. in a property rights case out of Texas on Sept. 29th, but forgot to mention that they accepted two cases that day. The second is an exactions case filed by property owner George Sheetz against the County of El Dorado, California. The well-crafted Petition should... Read More
Texas Takings Case Accepted by US Supreme Court
Big congratulations to our colleagues at the Institute for Justice for persuading the High Court to hear another takings case. On Friday, the Court granted the petition for certiorari on the following question presented: “In First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles, this Court recognized that the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause was... Read More
Everyone Loves Costco, Except Residents in Guilderland, NY
On the other side of the Hudson River, we have a “developing” eminent domain story involving a retailer that this blogger (and father of two) personally loves – Costco! What’s not to like? Great deals, diverse products, $5 giant rotisserie chicken…the list goes on. It seems you can purchase almost anything you could ever need... Read More
How Can a Redevelopment Designation Lead to a Taking by Eminent Domain?
In short, the determination that an area is designated “in need of redevelopment” by a local government, while not a constitutional taking itself, can be a precursor to a taking if the lawful procedure is followed by the government. Unless a property owner challenges the substance of the initial redevelopment designation at the time of... Read More
How One Texas Agency Restricted Its Eminent Domain Powers
Here is some eminent domain news from the Lone Star State. In a rarely seen maneuver (at least something this blogger has never), a new policy adopted by the Texas Parks & Wildlife Commission will restrict the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s (TPWD) future use of its eminent domain powers. Parks and Wildlife Code (section... Read More
Understanding Inverse Condemnation: Lessons from a Recent NJ Case
Inverse condemnation is a critical concept in property law, where property owners claim compensation from governmental entities that have effectively taken their property without formal condemnation proceedings. The case of 546 OG, LLC v. Edgewater highlights the complexities involved in such claims. In this instance, the court dismissed the inverse condemnation claim as “grossly out... Read More
